Implementing a system of care: Findings from the Fort Bragg Evaluation Project
- 1 December 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Mental Health Administration
- Vol. 23 (1) , 16-29
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02518640
Abstract
The Implementation Study of the Fort Bragg Evaluation documented how the Demonstration was executed and whether it met the expectations of the continuum of care philosophy upon which it was based. Based on the theory-driven and component approaches to program evaluation, a case study methodology was employed. First, the theories and assumptions about the Demonstration were explicated to derive a program model. Next, the program-as-implemented was compared to the program-as-planned. Barriers responsible for diluting full-scale implementation were documented. This study provides a comprehensive description of how the Demonstration was put into place and the evidence necessary to conclude that the Demonstration was executed with high fidelity, despite barriers, to provide an excellent test of the program theory.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- A model for measuring the implementation of community support programs: Results from three sitesCommunity Mental Health Journal, 1992
- Network Data and MeasurementAnnual Review of Sociology, 1990
- Implementation theory and the theory-driven approach to validityEvaluation and Program Planning, 1989
- Public and private responsibility for mental health services.American Psychologist, 1989
- Public and private responsibility for mental health services.American Psychologist, 1989
- The theory-driven approach to validityEvaluation and Program Planning, 1987
- Changing Patterns of State Responsibility: A Case Study of North CarolinaJournal of Clinical Child Psychology, 1985
- Improving Established Statewide ProgramsEvaluation Review, 1985
- Assessing Treatment Implementation Amid the Slings and Arrows of RealityEvaluation Review, 1984
- Measuring the Degree of Program ImplementationEvaluation Review, 1983