A Bioassay of Treatment of Hemorrhagic Shock
- 1 October 1966
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA)
- Vol. 93 (4) , 537-555
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1966.01330040001001
Abstract
SHOCK has been variously defined. The simplest definition, "a rude unhinging of life," aptly fits the depth of our state of ignorance about it. Its origins and manifestations vary, but the outcome is, nevertheless, the same: death, or recovery. Looking at the problem philosophically, the outcome in any particular case is unpredictable, and it must be so, as long as we are incapable of determining the biologic significance of each of the physiologic changes that accompany the genesis of shock. Is the fall of oxygen consumption that follows a large hemorrhage and accompanies shock regulatory (positive and good), nonregulatory (negative and bad), or positive at one time during the course of shock and negative at another? Is the acceleration of the secretions of the adrenal medulla and cortex positive and good, or negative and bad? Is the production of vasopressor proteoses and amines good or bad? Is the hyperpotassemia ofKeywords
This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: