Selection and Qualities of Reviewers
- 1 September 2001
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Academic Medicine
- Vol. 76 (9) , 914-916
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200109000-00016
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development of the Review Quality Instrument (RQI) for Assessing Peer Reviews of ManuscriptsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1999
- Reliability of Editors' Subjective Quality Ratings of Peer Reviews of ManuscriptsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1998
- What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?JAMA, 1998
- The role of the manuscript reviewer in the peer review process.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1995
- Evaluating Peer ReviewsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- Is There Gender Bias in JAMA's Peer Review Process?JAMA, 1994
- The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviewsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1993
- The Effects of Blinding on the Quality of Peer ReviewJAMA, 1990
- Editorial Peer Review in US Medical JournalsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1990
- Reviewer Status and Review QualityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985