Improved Clinical Efficacy of External Cardioversion by Fluoroscopic Electrode Positioning and Comparison to Internal Cardioversion in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 22 (1) , 233-237
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00339.x
Abstract
Background: Despite using different electrode positions, “conventional” external DC cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation is ineffective in 6%–50% of cases. An alternative when DC cardioversion is not successful is low energy internal cardioversion, which is performed at increased risk. We tested the hypothesis that optimization of electrode pad position under fluoroscopy to encompass as much atrial muscle as possible might improve the success rate of external cardioversion and thus minimize the need for internal cardioversion. Methods: Fifteen (9 males, 6 females) patients (age: 54 ± 15 years, weight: 124 ± 35 kg) with chronic atrial fibrillation (> 8 weeks) who had undergone unsuccessful conventional external cardioversion entered the study. Repeat conventional external cardioversion with electrodes in standard (right anterior and left posterior) positions was followed by “optimized” external cardioversion by positioning electrodes under fluoroscopy (using metallic markers). In case of failure, internal cardioversion was performed. Results: All 15 patients had undergone unsuccessful conventional external cardioversion with 360‐J shocks. Eight patients (group A) reverted to sinus rhythm with one or two 360‐J shocks using fluoroscopy‐guided pad placement (53%). Six of the remaining 7 (86%) patients (group B) had successful internal cardioversion with biphasic shocks (12 ± 3 J). The body weight and body mass index were statistically lower in group A vs group B (106 ± 27 vs 145 ± 33 kg, p = 0.03 and 35 ± 8 vs 45 ± 8 kg/m2, P = 0.48, respectively). There was no statistically significant in age, height, body surface area, duration of atrial fibrillation, amiodarone therapy, ejection fraction, or underlying heart disease. Conclusion: Unsuccessful external DC cardioversion, in some patients, is in part due to suboptimal conventional positioning of electrode pads that can be improved under fluoroscopic guidance by achieving the best possible vector encompassing the right and left atria. The optimized external cardioversion technique may minimize the need for internal cardioversion, which remains an effective approach when external cardioversion fails.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical Shock Tolerability and Effect of Different Right Atrial Electrode Locations on Efficacy of Low Energy Human Transvenous Atrial Defibrillation Using an Implantable Lead SystemJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1997
- Hemodynamic Effects and Clinical Determinants of Defibrillation Threshold for Transvenous Atrial Defibrillation Using Biatrial Biphasic Shocks in Patients with Chronic Atrial FibrillationPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1997
- Efficacy and tolerability of transvenous low energy cardioversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in humansJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1995
- Internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in sheep.Circulation, 1993
- Atrial Flutter, Atrial Fibrillation, and Other Primary Atrial TachycardiasMedical Clinics of North America, 1984
- Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: Consideration of embolization, anticoagulation, prophylactic pacemaker, and long-term successAmerican Heart Journal, 1982
- Transthoracic resistance in human defibrillation. Influence of body weight, chest size, serial shocks, paddle size and paddle contact pressure.Circulation, 1981
- Cardioversion and defibrillationAmerican Heart Journal, 1980
- Electrical reversion of cardiac arrhythmias.Heart, 1967
- Clinical SciencePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1962