Is No-Tension Design of Concrete or Rock Structures Always Safe?—Fracture Analysis
- 1 January 1996
- journal article
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Journal of Structural Engineering
- Vol. 122 (1) , 2-10
- https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1996)122:1(2)
Abstract
Plain concrete structures such as dams or retaining walls, as well as rock structures such as tunnels, caverns, excavations, and rock slopes, have commonly been designed by elastic–perfectly plastic analysis in which the tensile yield strength of the material is taken as zero. The paper analyzes the safety of this “no-tension” design in the light of the finiteness of the tensile strength of concrete or the tensile strength of rock between the joints. Through examples, it is demonstrated that: (1) the calculated length of cracks or cracking zones can correspond to an unstable state; (2) the uncracked ligament of the cross section, available for resisting horizontal shear loads, can be predicted much too large, compared to the fracture mechanics prediction; (3) the calculated load-deflection diagram can lie lower than that obtained by fracture mechanics; (4) the no-tension load capacity for a combination of crack face pressure and loads remote from the crack front, calculated by elastic analysis on the basi...Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Size Effect in Fracture of Ceramics and Its Use To Determine Fracture Energy and Effective Process Zone LengthJournal of the American Ceramic Society, 1990
- Advanced Dam Engineering for Design, Construction, and RehabilitationPublished by Springer Nature ,1988
- Size Effect in Blunt Fracture: Concrete, Rock, MetalJournal of Engineering Mechanics, 1984
- Elementary engineering fracture mechanicsPublished by Springer Nature ,1982
- A Failure Criterion for ConcreteJournal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 1977