A comparative evaluation of the estimators of the log Pearson type (LP) 3 distribution
- 1 January 1989
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Hydrology
- Vol. 105 (1-2) , 19-37
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(89)90094-2
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Robust flood frequency modelsWater Resources Research, 1982
- Combining site‐specific and regional information: An empirical Bayes ApproachWater Resources Research, 1982
- Sampling properties of parameter estimates for the log Pearson type 3 distribution, using moments in real spaceJournal of Hydrology, 1981
- Quantile estimation with more or less floodlike distributionsWater Resources Research, 1980
- Assessment of fitting techniques for the log Pearson type 3 distribution using Monte Carlo SimulationWater Resources Research, 1979
- Some comparisons of flood statistics in real and log spaceWater Resources Research, 1978
- The log Pearson type 3 distribution: The T‐year event and its asymptotic standard error by maximum likelihood theoryWater Resources Research, 1977
- The Log Pearson type 3 distribution and its application in hydrologyWater Resources Research, 1975
- Algebraic boundedness of sample statisticsWater Resources Research, 1974
- Eureka! It fits a Pearson type: 3 distributionWater Resources Research, 1973