Abstract
Zinc‐inefficient Sanilac and Zn‐efficient Saginaw navy bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) differ in their susceptibility to Zn‐deficiency stress. Sanilac accumulates Fe under Zn‐deficiency stress and Saginaw does not. These two navy bean cultivars were grown at 0, 0.006 and 0.12 mg/L Zn in modified Hoagland nutrient solution. Various Fe‐stress response mechanisms were quantified periodically over a 12‐day experimental period to determine if known factors in the Fe‐stress response mechanism were enhanced by Zn‐deficiency stress. Visual Zn‐deficiency symptoms were more severe in Sanilac than Saginaw navy bean under equivalent Zn treatments. Sanilac contained lower leaf Zn than Saginaw when Zn was present in solution (0.006 and 0.12 mg/L Zn), but the two cultivars were similar in leaf Zn in the absence of Zn (0 mg/L Zn). Sanilac accumulated more leaf Fe than Saginaw when under Zn stress (0 and 0.006 mg/L Zn). The higher levels of leaf Fe in Sanilac than Saginaw were closely associated with enhanced release of reductants and increased reduction of Fe3+ to Fe2+ by roots of Sanilac. Saginaw navy bean roots reduced Fe3+ to Fe2+ similarly to Sanilac with adequate Zn present in solution (0.12 mg/L), but experienced minuscule levels of Fe3+ reduction under Zn deficiency. Zinc deficiency stimulated the initiation of the Fe‐stress response mechanism in Sanilac, but not Saginaw, which may have enhanced the development of Zn‐deficiency symptoms in Sanilac due to the increased uptake of Fe by this cultivar. The common Fe‐deficiency stress response associated primarily with grasses (release of phytosiderophore) was not found in either navy bean cultivar.