“The Public” Vs. “The Experts”: Perceived Vs. Actual Disagreements About Risks of Nuclear Power
- 1 January 1983
- book chapter
- Published by Springer Nature
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lay Foibles and Expert Fables in Judgments about RiskThe American Statistician, 1982
- Blueprint for Breakdown: Three Mile Island and the Media Before the AccidentJournal of Communication, 1981
- Can There Be a Consensus on Nuclear Power?Social Studies of Science, 1980
- Public Doubts About ScienceScience, 1980
- The silence of scientistsChemical & Engineering News, 1980
- Risk and ResponsibilityScience, 1979
- How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefitsPolicy Sciences, 1978
- The Berger Inquiry: An Impact Assessment ProcessScience, 1978
- Science and technology in the nuclear regulatory process: the case of Canadian uranium minersCanadian Public Administration/Administration publique du Canada, 1978
- Science, Values, and Human JudgmentScience, 1976