No Toyotas In Health Care: Why Medical Care Has Not Evolved To Meet Patients’ Needs
Open Access
- 1 November 2001
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 20 (6) , 44-56
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.44
Abstract
The incentives and structure of health care in the United States produce exactly what we should expect in the quality of care for chronic disease: highly variable patterns of care and widespread failure to implement evidence-based best practices. The persistent inability of providers to improve patterns of practice is due in part to the lack of a “business case for quality.” Providers cannot anticipate that quality improvements will result in higher prices, increased volume, or decreased costs. However, signs of a business case for quality are emerging, fueled by cost pressures, the increased availability of data, informed consumers, and public- and private-sector purchaser initiatives.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Theory and Practice in the Design of Physician Payment IncentivesThe Milbank Quarterly, 2001
- Do Consumers Use Information to Choose a Health‐Care Provider System?The Milbank Quarterly, 2000
- A Report Card on Continuous Quality ImprovementThe Milbank Quarterly, 1998
- Is Health Care Ready for Six Sigma Quality?The Milbank Quarterly, 1998
- The Urgent Need to Improve Health Care QualityInstitute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care QualityJAMA, 1998
- Rolling Down the RunwayJAMA, 1998
- Managed Care Is Not the Problem, Quality IsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- Informing Consumer Decisions in Health Care: Implications from Decision‐Making ResearchThe Milbank Quarterly, 1997
- Reform of the Veterans Affairs Health Care SystemNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Lessons for Guidelines from the Diffusion of InnovationsThe Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 1995