Pitfalls and biases in the reporting and interpretation of the results of clinical trials
- 31 March 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Lung Cancer
- Vol. 10, S143-S150
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5002(94)91676-4
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy as Compared with Radiation Therapy in Stage III Non-Small-Cell CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- A Randomized Trial of Induction Chemotherapy plus High-Dose Radiation versus Radiation Alone in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Stopping rules and estimation problems in clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1988
- Statistical Problems in the Reporting of Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Comparing survival of responders and nonresponders after treatment: A potential source of confusion in interpreting cancer clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1983
- Analysis of survival by tumor response.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1983
- Patient subsets and variation in therapeutic efficacy.British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1982
- Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. Analysis and examplesBritish Journal of Cancer, 1977
- Randomized Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1976
- Statistics: The Problem of Examining Accumulating Data More Than OnceNew England Journal of Medicine, 1974