Pharmacological interventions for recurrent abdominal pain (RAP) in childhood
- 21 January 2002
- reference entry
- Published by Wiley
- No. 1,p. CD003017
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd003017
Abstract
Background Between 4% and 25% of school age children complain of recurrent abdominal pain (RAP) of sufficient severity to interfere with daily activities. For the majority of such children no organic cause for their pain can be found on physical examination or investigation. Although most children are likely managed by reassurance and simple measures, a large range of interventions has been recommended. Objectives To determine the effectiveness of medication for recurrent abdominal pain in school‐age children. Search methods The Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, PsycLIT, LILACS and JICST were searched using a strategy combining (Recurrent OR synonyms) AND (Abdomen OR synonyms) AND (Pain OR synonyms). Where appropriate search filters were employed. In addition, researchers working in this area were asked to identify relevant studies. Selection criteria Any study in which the majority of participants were school age children fulfilling standard criteria for RAP, and who were allocated by random or quasi‐random methods to any drug treatment compared with a placebo or no treatment . Data collection and analysis References identified by the searches were screened against the inclusion criteria by two independent reviewers. Main results Only one trial met the inclusion criteria. This cross‐over trial in 14 children who met suggested criteria for "abdominal migraine" compared pizotifen and placebo, each given for one month with no washout period. Participants reported a mean of 8.21 (95% CI 2.93, 13.48) fewer days of pain while taking the active drug. They also reported that the mean difference on an "Index of Severity" was ‐16.21 (95% CI ‐26.51, ‐5.90) and on an "Index of Misery" was ‐56.07 (95% CI ‐94.07, ‐18.07). Authors' conclusions There is little evidence to suggest that recommended drugs are effective in the management of RAP. At present there seems little justification for the use of these drugs other than in clinical trials. There is an urgent need for trials of all suggested pharmacologic interventions in children with RAP.Keywords
This publication has 69 references indexed in Scilit:
- Practitioner Review: Assessment and Management of Somatisation in Childhood and Adolescence: A Practical PerspectiveJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1999
- Survey of Pediatricians' Management Practices for Recurrent Abdominal PainJournal of Pediatric Psychology, 1994
- CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CHILDHOOD ABDOMINAL MIGRAINE IN AN URBAN GENERAL PRACTICEDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1993
- Measurements of Stress and Coping Among School‐Aged Children With and Without Recurrent Abdominal PainJournal of School Health, 1991
- Children with Recurrent Abdominal Pain and Their Parents: More Somatic Complaints, Anxiety, and Depression than Other Patient Families?Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 1989
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- On ???Clinical Approach to Recurrent Abdominal Pain in Children???Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 1986
- Food intolerance and food allergy in children: a review of 68 cases.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1982
- Lactose malabsorption in recurrent abdominal pain of childhoodThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1982
- Recurrent Abdominal Pain of Childhood Due to Lactose IntoleranceNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979