How Bayer Makes Decisions to Develop New Drugs
- 1 December 2002
- journal article
- Published by Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) in Interfaces
- Vol. 32 (6) , 77-90
- https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.32.6.77.6475
Abstract
Drug development is time consuming, resource intensive, risky, and heavily regulated. To ensure that it makes the best drug-development decisions, Bayer Pharmaceuticals (Pharma) uses a structured process based on the principles of decision analysis to evaluate the technical feasibility and market potential of its new drugs. In July 1999, the biological products leadership committee composed of the senior managers within Bayer Biological Products (BP), a business unit of Pharma, made its newly formed strategic-planning department responsible for the commercial evaluation of a new blood-clot-busting drug. Even though Pharma's use of decision analysis began in the late 1980s, this commercial evaluation was BP's first decision analysis project. Previously, BP had analyzed a few business cases for review by Pharma. Pharma senior managers considered our recommendations relevant to their decision making. The project also institutionalized decision analysis at the business-unit level.This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Simple Probabilistic Evaluation of Portfolio StrategiesInterfaces, 1999
- A Dialogue Process for Choosing Value-Creating StrategiesInterfaces, 1999
- A Comparison of Recombinant Urokinase with Vascular Surgery as Initial Treatment for Acute Arterial Occlusion of the LegsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Intra-arterial urokinase versus surgery for acute peripheral arterial occlusion.American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 1997
- Thrombolysis or peripheral arterial surgery: Phase I resultsJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1996
- Facilities Evaluation under Uncertainty: Pricing a RefineryInterfaces, 1995
- Trends in Drug Development Costs, Times, and RisksDrug Information Journal, 1995
- Returns to R&D on new drug introductions in the 1980sJournal of Health Economics, 1994
- Quantifying judgmental uncertainty: Methodology, experiences, and insightsIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1987
- Three-Point Approximations for Continuous Random VariablesManagement Science, 1983