Increasing Use of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation During Out-of-Hospital Ventricular Fibrillation Arrest
- 19 December 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 114 (25) , 2760-2765
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.106.654715
Abstract
Background— The most recent resuscitation guidelines have sought to improve the interface between defibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation; the survival impact of these changes is unknown, however. A year before issuance of the most recent guidelines, we implemented protocol changes that provided a single shock without rhythm reanalysis, stacked shocks, or postdefibrillation pulse check, and extended the period of cardiopulmonary resuscitation from 1 to 2 minutes. We hypothesized that survival would be better with the new protocol. Methods and Results— The present study took place in a community with a 2-tiered emergency medical services response and an established system of cardiac arrest surveillance, training, and review. The investigation was a cohort study of persons who had bystander-witnessed out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation arrest because of heart disease, comparing a prospectively defined intervention group (January 1, 2005, to January 31, 2006) with a historical control group that was treated according to previous guidelines of rhythm reanalysis, stacked shocks, and postdefibrillation pulse checks (January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2004). The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. The proportion of treated arrests that met inclusion criteria was similar for intervention and control periods (15.4% [134/869] versus 16.6% [374/2255]). Survival to hospital discharge was significantly greater during the intervention period compared with the control period (46% [61/134] versus 33% [122/374], P =0.008) and corresponded to a decrease in the interval from shock to start of chest compressions (28 versus 7 seconds). Adjustment for covariates did not alter the survival association. Conclusions— These results suggest the new resuscitation guidelines will alter the interface between defibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation and in turn may improve outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Three-Phase Model of Cardiac Arrest: Time-Dependent Benefit of Bystander Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2006
- Automated External Defibrillators: To What Extent Does the Algorithm Delay CPR?Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2005
- Hyperventilation-Induced Hypotension During Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationCirculation, 2004
- Automated external defibrillation versus manual defibrillation for prolonged ventricular fibrillationAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2003
- Interruption of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the use of the automated external defibrillator in out-of-hospital cardiac arrestAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2003
- Treatment of Comatose Survivors of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest with Induced HypothermiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Mild Therapeutic Hypothermia to Improve the Neurologic Outcome after Cardiac ArrestNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Defibrillation by Basic Emergency Medical Technicians: Effect on SurvivalAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1995
- Hawthorne Effect: Implications for Prehospital ResearchAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1995
- Effect of Out-of-Hospital Defibrillation by Basic Life Support Providers on Cardiac Arrest Mortality: A MetaanalysisAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1995