Why the Hauser-Feshbach formula works
- 1 February 1975
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review C
- Vol. 11 (2) , 426-436
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.11.426
Abstract
It is shown that flux conservation requires substantial channel-channel correlations of resonance amplitudes. These, together with the effects of level-level correlations and other terms conspire to cancel the large additive corrections to the Hauser-Feshbach formula for the fluctuation cross section. The remaining multiplicative corrections become negligible for nonelastic cross sections when many channels are open. In other cases, approximation formulas provide estimates that are adequate for most purposes. However, the Bohr independence hypothesis is not always satisfied when fewer than about 20 channels are open. The cross section correlation width is shown to differ markedly from the average width. The use of the former for estimating the Hauser-Feshbach denominator is found to be justified. All of these results are verified by means of statistical model calculations of resonance parameters and of cross sections.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Level-level correlations in Hauser-Feshbach theory and Moldauer's sum rule for resonance reactionsPhysical Review C, 1974
- Modification of Hauser-Feshbach calculations by direct-reaction channel couplingAnnals of Physics, 1973
- Resonance Widths and Spacings: Their Averages and DistributionsPhysical Review B, 1968
- Sum Rule for Resonance ReactionsPhysical Review Letters, 1967
- Unitary Models of Nuclear Resonance ReactionsPhysical Review B, 1967
- Statistical Theory of Nuclear Collision Cross SectionsPhysical Review B, 1964
- Average compound nucleus cross sections in the continuumPhysics Letters, 1963
- Theory of Average Neutron Reaction Cross Sections in the Resonance RegionPhysical Review B, 1961
- The Inelastic Scattering of NeutronsPhysical Review B, 1952
- Nuclear Physics B. Nuclear Dynamics, TheoreticalReviews of Modern Physics, 1937