Democratic Theory and the Public Interest: Condorcet and Rousseau Revisited
- 1 December 1989
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 83 (4) , 1317-1340
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1961672
Abstract
Bernard Grofman and Scott Feld argued in the June 1988 issue of thisReviewthat Jean-Jacques Rousseau's contributions to democratic political theory could be illuminated by invoking the theorizing of one of his eighteenth-century contemporaries, the Marquis de Condorcet, about individual and collective preferences or judgments. Grofman and Feld's claims about collective consciousness and the efficacy of the public interest provoke debate. One focus of discourse lies in the application of Condorcet's jury theorem to Rousseau's theory of the general will. In this controversy David M. Estlund and Jeremy Waldron in turn raise a variety of issues of theory and interpretation; Grofman and Feld then extend their argument, and propose clarifications.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparative study of differences in subjective likelihood estimates made by individuals, interacting groups, Delphi groups, and nominal groupsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- An Epistemic Conception of DemocracyEthics, 1986
- On the Possibility of Faithfully Representative CommitteesAmerican Political Science Review, 1986
- Group size and the performance of a composite group majority: Statistical truths and empirical resultsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1984
- Optimal Decision Rules in Uncertain Dichotomous Choice SituationsInternational Economic Review, 1982
- Living with Conflict: Representation in the Theory of Adversary DemocracyEthics, 1981
- THE SLIPPERY SLOPE: Jury Size and Jury Verdict Requirements—Legal and Social Science ApproachesLaw & Policy, 1980
- A comment on ‘democratic theory: A preliminary mathematical model.’Public Choice, 1975
- Helping behavior and group size: Some exploratory stochastic modelsBehavioral Science, 1974
- VI.—GAMES, JUSTICE AND THE GENERAL WILLMind, 1965