Feeding, fins and braking maneuvers: locomotion during prey capture in centrarchid fishes
Open Access
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- Published by The Company of Biologists in Journal of Experimental Biology
- Vol. 210 (1) , 107-117
- https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.02634
Abstract
Locomotion is an integral aspect of the prey capture strategy of almost every predatory animal. For fishes that employ suction to draw prey into their mouths, locomotor movements are vital for the correct positioning of the mouth relative to the prey item. Despite this, little is known regarding the relationships between locomotor movements and prey capture. To gain insights into how fishes move during prey capture and the mechanisms underlying deceleration during prey capture, I measured the fin and body movements of largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides, and bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus. Using a high-speed video camera (500 frames s-1), I captured locomotor and feeding movements in lateral and ventral (via a mirror) view. Largemouth bass swam considerably faster than bluegill during the approach to the prey item, and both species decelerated substantially following prey capture. The mean magnitude of deceleration was significantly higher in largemouth bass (-1089 cm s-2) than bluegill (-235 cm s-2), and the timing of maximum deceleration was much later for largemouth bass (30.3 ms after maximum gape) than bluegill (6.7 ms after maximum gape). Both species employed their pectoral, anal and caudal fins in order to decelerate during prey capture. However, largemouth bass protracted their pectoral fins more and faster, likely contributing to the greater magnitude of deceleration in the species. The primary mechanism for increased deceleration was an increase in approach speed. The drag forces experienced by the fins and body are proportional to the velocity of the flow squared. Thus, the braking forces exerted by fins, without any change in kinematics, will increase exponentially with small increases in swimming speed, perhaps allowing these fishes to achieve higher braking forces at higher swimming speeds without altering body or fin kinematics. This result can likely be extended to other maneuvers such as turning.Keywords
This publication has 66 references indexed in Scilit:
- The pressures of suction feeding: the relation between buccal pressure and induced fluid speed in centrarchid fishesJournal of Experimental Biology, 2006
- Constraints on starting and stopping: behavior compensates for reduced pectoral fin area during braking of the bluegill sunfishLepomis macrochirusJournal of Experimental Biology, 2005
- Coordination of feeding, locomotor and visual systems in parrotfishes(Teleostei: Labridae)Journal of Experimental Biology, 2005
- Comparisons of aquatic versus terrestrial predatory strikes in the pitviper,Agkistrodon piscivorusJournal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Comparative Experimental Biology, 2005
- Wake Dynamics and Locomotor Function in Fishes: Interpreting Evolutionary Patterns in Pectoral Fin DesignIntegrative and Comparative Biology, 2002
- The relationship between forelimb morphology and behaviour in North American carnivores (Carnivora)Canadian Journal of Zoology, 1999
- Feeding biology of sunfishes: patterns of variation in the feeding mechanismZoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1986
- Body Form, Locomotion and Foraging in Aquatic VertebratesAmerican Zoologist, 1984
- A quantitative hydrodynamical model of suction feeding in fishJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1982
- Prey capture in the chain pickerel, Esox niger: correlations between feeding and locomotor behaviorCanadian Journal of Zoology, 1981