Use of Biomarkers and Surrogate Endpoints in Drug Development and Regulatory Decision Making: Criteria, Validation, Strategies
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2001
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Annual Reviews in Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology
- Vol. 41 (1) , 347-366
- https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.41.1.347
Abstract
In the future, biomarkers will play an increasingly important role in all phases of drug development, including regulatory review. However, only a few of these biomarkers will become established well enough to serve in regulatory decision making as surrogate endpoints, thereby substituting for traditional clinical endpoints. Even generally accepted surrogate endpoints are unlikely to capture all the therapeutic benefits and potential adverse effects a drug will have in a diverse patient population. Accordingly, combinations of biomarkers probably will be needed to provide a more complete characterization of the spectrum of pharmacologic response. In the future, pharmacogenomic approaches, including those based on differential expression of gene arrays, will provide panels of relevant biomarkers that can be expected to transform the drug development process.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- New approaches to the uses of beta blocking drugs in hypertensionJournal of Human Hypertension, 2000
- A gene expression database for the molecular pharmacology of cancerNature Genetics, 2000
- Functional genomics and DNA array techniques in atherosclerosis researchCurrent Opinion in Lipidology, 1999
- The contribution of clinical pharmacology surrogates and models to drug development—a critical appraisalBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1997
- An Evaluation of the Integration of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Principles in Clinical Drug DevelopmentClinical Pharmacokinetics, 1997
- Relevance of the Application of Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modelling Concepts in Drug DevelopmentClinical Pharmacokinetics, 1997
- How Much Can We Rely on the Level of Prostate-Specific Antigen as an End Point for Evaluation of Clinical Trials? A Word of Caution!JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1996
- Effect of Fluoride Treatment on the Fracture Rate in Postmenopausal Women with OsteoporosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- The influence of hypertension and other hemodynamic factors in atherogenesisProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1983
- Kinetic Analysis of the Vasodilator and Ganglionic Blocking Actions of N-AcetylprocainamideJournal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 1982