The effect of pre- versus postinjury infiltration with lidocaine on thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia after heat injury to the skin
- 1 April 1993
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Pain
- Vol. 53 (1) , 43-51
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(93)90054-s
Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of pre- and postinjury infiltration with lidocaine on alterations in mechanical and thermal sensitivity after heat injury to the skin. In the first part of the study, burn injuries (15 x 25 mm rectangular thermode, 50 degrees C, 7 min) were produced twice in each subject on the medial side of the left and right calves at least 24 h apart in 8 healthy, unmedicated male volunteers, in order to investigate the effects of the injury on sensitivity in untreated skin. In the second part of the study, burn injuries (15 x 25 mm rectangular thermode, 50 degrees C, 6 min) were produced twice in each subject on the medial side of the left and right calves at least 24 h apart (n = 10). This was preceded by subcutaneous (s.c.) infiltration with 5-6 ml of 1% plain lidocaine (pre-injury block) on one day, and the same block was performed 35 min after injury (postinjury block) on the other day. Warm detection thresholds (WDT) and heat pain detection thresholds (HPDT) were determined within and outside the injury before and at regular intervals after injury. Areas of hyperalgesia to pinprick and brush were determined at regular intervals after injury. In the first part of the study, it was observed that both WDT and HPDT were decreased within but not outside the injury, and areas of hyperalgesia to pinprick and brush were found in- and outside the injury in all subjects. These findings were relatively constant throughout the study period and reproducible between the 2 days of examination. In the second part of the study, it was observed that pre-injury infiltration with lidocaine reduced hyperalgesia to pinprick and brush outside the injury more effectively than postinjury block, but only for the first 70 min after injury, while no significant difference was observed 100-190 min after injury. Likewise, there was no difference in thermal thresholds inside the injury between pre- and postinjury treatment at the end of the study period. It is concluded, that a shortlasting 'preemptive' infiltration with lidocaine may postpone but not prevent the occurrence of hyperalgesia outside a thermal injury.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantitative sensory examination in human epidural anaesthesia and analgesia: effects of lidocainePain, 1992
- PAIN SENSATION AND NOCICEPTIVE REFLEX EXCITABILITY IN SURGICAL PATIENTS AND HUMAN VOLUNTEERSBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1992
- INFLUENCE OF TIMING ON THE EFFECT OF CONTINUOUS EXTRADURAL ANALGESIA WITH BUPIVACAINE AND MORPHINE AFTER MAJOR ABDOMINAL SURGERYBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1992
- EFFECT OF PRE- VS POSTOPERATIVE INGUINAL FIELD BLOCK ON POSTOPERATIVE PAIN AFTER HERNIORRHAPHYBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1992
- Neurogenic hyperalgesia: the search for the primary cutaneous afferent fibers that contribute to capsaicin-induced pain and hyperalgesiaJournal of Neurophysiology, 1991
- Central nervous system plasticity in the tonic pain response to subcutaneous formalin injectionBrain Research, 1990
- PREVENTION OF POSTOPERATIVE PAIN BY BALANCED ANALGESIABritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1990
- Peripheral origins and central modulation of subcutaneous formalin-induced activity of rat dorsal horn neuronesNeuroscience Letters, 1987
- Subcutaneous formalin-induced activity of dorsal horn neurones in the rat: differential response to an intrathecal opiate administered pre or post formalinPain, 1987
- Cutaneous hyperalgesia: contributions of the peripheral and central nervous systems to the increase in pain sensitivity after injuryBrain Research, 1987