Computational modeling of retinotopic map development to define contributions of EphA‐ephrinA gradients, axon‐axon interactions, and patterned activity
- 1 March 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Neurobiology
- Vol. 59 (1) , 95-113
- https://doi.org/10.1002/neu.10341
Abstract
The topographic projection of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axons to mouse superior colliculus (SC) or chick optic tectum (OT) is formed in three phases: RGC axons overshoot their termination zone (TZ); they exhibit interstitial branching along the axon that is topographically biased for the correct location of their future TZ; and branches arborize preferentially at the TZ and the initial exuberant projection refines through axon and branch elimination to generate a precise retinotopic map. We present a computational model of map development that demonstrates that the countergradients of EphAs and ephrinAs in retina and the OT/SC and bidirectional repellent signaling between RGC axons and OT/SC cells are sufficient to direct an initial topographic bias in RGC axon branching. Our model also suggests that a proposed repellent action of EphAs/ephrinAs present on RGC branches and arbors added to that of EphAs/ephrinAs expressed by OT/SC cells is required to progressively restrict branching and arborization to topographically correct locations and eliminate axon overshoot. Simulations show that this molecular framework alone can develop considerable topographic order and refinement, including axon elimination, a feature not programmed into the model. Generating a refined map with a condensed TZ as in vivo requires an additional parameter that enhances branch formation along an RGC axon near sites that it has a higher branch density, and resembles an assumed role for patterned neural activity. The same computational model generates the phenotypes reported in ephrinA deficient mice and Isl2‐EphA3 knockin mice. This modeling suggests that gradients of counter‐repellents can establish a substantial degree of topographic order in the OT/SC, and that repellents present on RGC axon branches and arbors make a substantial contribution to map refinement. However, competitive interactions between RGC axons that enhance the probability of continued local branching are required to generate precise retinotopy. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Neurobiol 59: 95–113, 2004Keywords
Funding Information
- NIH (EY07025)
- Neuroplasticity of Aging Training Grant (T32 AG00216)
This publication has 71 references indexed in Scilit:
- Topographic Mapping from the Retina to the Midbrain Is Controlled by Relative but Not Absolute Levels of EphA Receptor SignalingCell, 2000
- Topographic Mapping in the Retinotectal Projection by Means of Complementary Ligand and Receptor Gradients: a Computer Simulation StudyJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1998
- THE EPHRINS AND EPH RECEPTORS IN NEURAL DEVELOPMENTAnnual Review of Neuroscience, 1998
- Chromophore-assisted laser inactivation of a repulsive axonal guidance moleculeCurrent Biology, 1996
- Nuk Controls Pathfinding of Commissural Axons in the Mammalian Central Nervous SystemCell, 1996
- Spatial Signaling in the Development and Function of Neural ConnectionsCerebral Cortex, 1991
- Disturbance of refinement of retinotectal projection in chick embryos by tetrodotoxin and grayanotoxinDevelopmental Brain Research, 1990
- The effects of eliminating impulse activity on the development of the retinotectal projection in salamandersJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1980
- Retinotectal Specificity: Models and Experiments in Search of a Mapping FunctionAnnual Review of Neuroscience, 1980
- How patterned neural connections can be set up by self-organizationProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1976