Electrocardiographic Diagnosis of Evolving Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Presence of Left Bundle-Branch Block
Open Access
- 22 February 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 334 (8) , 481-487
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199602223340801
Abstract
The presence of left bundle-branch block on the electrocardiogram may conceal the changes of acute myocardial infarction, which can delay both its recognition and treatment. We tested electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of acute infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block. Methods The base-line electrocardiograms of patients enrolled in the GUSTO-1 (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries) trial who had left bundle-branch block and acute myocardial infarction confirmed by enzyme studies were blindly compared with the electrocardiograms of control patients who had chronic coronary artery disease and left bundle-branch block. The electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of infarction were then tested in an independent sample of patients presenting with acute chest pain and left bundle-branch block. Results Of 26,003 North American patients, 131 (0.5 percent) with acute myocardial infarction had left bundle-branch block. The three electrocardiographic criteria with independent value in the diagnosis of acute infarction in these patients were ST-segment elevation of 1 mm or more that was concordant with (in the same direction as) the QRS complex; ST-segment depression of 1 mm or more in lead V1, V2, or V3; and ST-segment elevation of 5 mm or more that was discordant with (in the opposite direction from) the QRS complex. We used these three criteria to develop a scoring system (0 to 5), which allowed a highly specific diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction to be made. Conclusions We developed and validated a clinical prediction rule based on a set of electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with chest pain and left bundle-branch block. The use of these criteria, which are based on simple ST-segment changes, may help identify patients with acute myocardial infarction, who can then receive appropriate treatment.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Missed diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department: Results from a multicenter studyAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1993
- Litigation against the emergency physician: Common features in cases of missed myocardial infarctionAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1989
- Electrocardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction in the presence of complete left bundle branch blockAmerican Heart Journal, 1988
- Clinical Prediction RulesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- A Predictive Instrument to Improve Coronary-Care-Unit Admission Practices in Acute Ischemic Heart DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Problems of Spectrum and Bias in Evaluating the Efficacy of Diagnostic TestsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- The clinical significance of bundle branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. 1. Clinical characteristics, hospital mortality, and one-year follow-up.Circulation, 1978
- Electrocardiographic Changes in Acute Subendocardial InfarctionCirculation, 1958
- Electrocardiographic Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction in the Presence of Left Bundle-Branch BlockCirculation, 1957
- Observations on the Electrocardiogram and Ventricular Gradient in Complete Left Bundle Branch BlockCirculation, 1951