High Pass Digital and Analog Filtering of the Middle Latency Response
- 1 April 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Ear & Hearing
- Vol. 8 (2) , 101-109
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-198704000-00007
Abstract
Digital filtration with zero and standard-phase shift characteristics was performed on unfiltered auditory evoked potentials recorded from 10 adult subjects. Standard-phase shift filters were seen to distort the response. Mild phase shift distortion often augmented the IV/V-Na1 amplitude (auditory brain stem response). When recording the IV/V-Na1 amplitude on a narrow timebase (20 msec), we recommend using a phase shift filter that ha a high-pass cutoff frequency approximating 15 Hz and a slope of 12 to 24 dB/octave, in order to take advantage of the observed phase shift augmentation. The augmentation of the IV/V-Na1 amplitude is at the expense of the IV/V-Na2 amplitude. Thus, this phase shift distortion is not desirable if a long timebase (50 msec) is used. If a high-pass standard-phase shift filter of 100 Hz is used to eliminate muscle artifact, a reduction in the IV/V-Na1 amplitude from phase shift distortion is seen compared to the zero-phase shift control. In site-of-lesion testing, a nondistorted waveform produced by digital zero-phase shift filtration is also desirable over a distorted analog response. It is recommended that the slow wave activity of the response be recorded with a timebase of at least 40 to 50 msec and with a filter that produces minimal or no phase shifting. The major recorded response will be the Na trough and Pa peak. Evoked response units with steep filters will phase shift the response and produce a reduction in the IV/V-Na amplitude and a concomitant augmentation of the latter middle latency response waveforms. This augmentation has a variable configuration and therefore, recording with a long timebase (100 msec) will be required to record this activity.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Properties of the Brain-stem Response Slow-Wave Component: II. Frequency SpecificityJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1983
- Auditory Middle-Latency Responses in HumansInternational Journal of Audiology, 1983
- Auditory middle latency responses (MLRs) in patients with cortical lesionsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1982
- Distortion of the Middle Latency Auditory Response Produced by Analog FilteringScandinavian Audiology, 1982
- Power Spectral Analysis of Auditory Brain Stem Responses to Pure Tone StimuliScandinavian Audiology, 1982
- Bessel filtering of brain stem auditory evoked potentialsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1981
- Analogue and Digital Filtering of Auditory Brainstem ResponsesScandinavian Audiology, 1981
- Middle Component AERs from Neonates to Low-Level Tonal StimuliJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1980
- A Slow Brain Stem Response for Low-Frequency AudiometryInternational Journal of Audiology, 1979
- Electrophysiologic Response Audiometry: State of the ArtJournal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1977