Comparison of Accuracy Between the Partin Tables Of 1997 and 2001 to Predict Final Pathological Stage in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 171 (1) , 177-181
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000099827.77355.a7
Abstract
We validated externally the predictive accuracy of the 2001 Partin tables and compared the 1997 and 2001 versions.We used ROC derived AUC to test the predictive accuracy of organ confinement (OC), extraprostatic extension (ECE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) and lymph node involvement (LNI) of 1997 and 2001 Partin tables derived probabilities. These probabilities were defined by the pretreatment clinical stage, serum prostate specific antigen and biopsy Gleason grade of 2,139 patients treated with radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.OC, ECE, SVI and LNI were noted in 63.5%, 23.1%, 10.5% and 2.9% of cases, respectively. AUC of the 2001 tables was 0.787, 0.766, 0.775 and 0.790, for OC, ECE, SVI and LNI, respectively. These values were virtually the same as the respective 1997 Partin table AUC values, namely 0.784, 0.728, 0.791 and 0.799.This external validation of the 2001 Partin tables confirms good predictive accuracy of the updated tables. However, predictive accuracy in this external validation data set of 2,139 European men is virtually the same as that of the original 1997 tables. Therefore, a transition from the 1997 tables to the updated 2001 version does not appear warranted unless superior accuracy is demonstrated in other external cohorts.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can Predictive Models for Prostate Cancer Patients Derived in the United States of America Be Utilized in European Patients? A Validation Study of the Partin TablesEuropean Urology, 2003
- PROSPECTIVE VALIDATION OF AN ALGORITHM WITH SYSTEMATIC SEXTANT BIOPSY TO PREDICT PELVIC LYMPH NODE METASTASIS IN PATIENTS WITH CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATIC CARCINOMAJournal of Urology, 2002
- Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin Tables) for the new millenniumUrology, 2001
- A CATALOG OF PROSTATE CANCER NOMOGRAMSJournal of Urology, 2001
- VALIDATION OF PARTIN TABLES FOR PREDICTING PATHOLOGICAL STAGE OF CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, 2000
- Stage migration in clinically localized prostate cancer.European Urology, 2000
- Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional updatePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- Evaluation of a Nomogram used to predict the pathologic stage of clinically localized prostate carcinomaCancer, 1997
- The Use of Prostate Specific Antigen, Clinical Stage and Gleason Score to Predict Pathological Stage in Men with Localized Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1993
- Zonal Distribution of Prostatic AdenocarcinomaThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1988