Methodological Issues and Selected Economic Consequences of Substance Abuse in Ontario
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Addiction Research
- Vol. 7 (5) , 417-431
- https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359909004396
Abstract
Substance abuse not only adversely affects the health of users, but also imposes economic and other burdens on those around them and the society at large. Estimates of the economic costs of substance abuse are in demand by health planners, policy makers and researchers. This paper estimates selected economic consequences of substance abuse in Ontario in 1992. The cost-of-illness method, in particular, the human capital approach, is used. In addition to employment earnings, employee fringe benefits and the value of housekeeping for both men and women in and outside of the labour force are taken into account when computing productivity losses due to premature death. The costs of hospital care plus productivity losses associated with premature death are estimated to be Cdn $4.42 billion in 1992 for the province of Ontario. It is also found that the harm associated with substance abuse is higher for men than for women.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The economic costs of alcohol, tobacco and illicit drugs in Canada, 1992Addiction, 1998
- Cost-Effectiveness in Health and MedicinePublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1996
- Estimating the costs of substance abuse to the Medicaid hospital care program.American Journal of Public Health, 1995
- The value of household work in Canada, 1992Statistical Journal of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, 1994
- The Changing Epidemiology of Hepatitis B in the United StatesJAMA, 1990
- Cost-of-Illness Methodology: A Guide to Current Practices and ProceduresThe Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and Society, 1982