International Comparison of Dielectric Measurements
- 1 December 1964
- journal article
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
- Vol. IM-13 (4) , 305-311
- https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.1964.4313418
Abstract
Three materials, i.e.,fused silica, glass, and alumina, were selected for comparison based on known or expected homogeneity, isotropy, and stability. Measurements were made by the three Government laboratories (U. K., U. S. A., and Canada), both in the radio-frequency range, using capacitor-type holders either with or without an air gap, and at microwave frequencies, using either cavity-resonance methods or transmission-line impedance methods. The range among the laboratories on the real part of the permittivity is 0.4, 0.8, and 0.2 per cent for the three materials, respectively. The agreement on loss tangent is of the order of 0.0001 in many cases, but larger discrepancies exist. An introductory statistical analysis for systematic differences between laboratories is given.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Precision Capacitance-Conductance Bridge for Dielectric Measurements at Audio and Low Radio FrequenciesReview of Scientific Instruments, 1963
- Measurement and Standardization of Dielectric SamplesIRE Transactions on Instrumentation, 1962
- Frequency Stabilization of Microwave OscillatorsProceedings of the IRE, 1947
- Cavity resonators for measurements with centimetre electromagnetic wavesProceedings of the Physical Society, 1947
- Electronic Frequency Stabilization of Microwave OscillatorsReview of Scientific Instruments, 1946
- Resonance methods of dielectric measurement at centimetre wavelengthsJournal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers - Part I: General, 1946
- Screened mercury-electrode clamps for dielectric measurementsJournal of Scientific Instruments, 1940