Advantages of a Topographically Controlled Runoff Simulation in a Soil–Vegetation–Atmosphere Transfer Model
Open Access
- 1 April 2002
- journal article
- Published by American Meteorological Society in Journal of Hydrometeorology
- Vol. 3 (2) , 131-148
- https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003<0131:aoatcr>2.0.co;2
Abstract
Two methods to incorporate subgrid variability in soil moisture and runoff production into soil–vegetation–atmosphere transfer (SVAT) models are compared: 1) the variable infiltration capacity model approach (VIC), and 2) a modified “TOPMODEL” approach. Because neither approach needs to track surface or subsurface flow within a catchment explicitly, they represent computationally efficient ways to represent hydrologic processes within the context of regional and global modeling. This study shows that, during low flow periods, the runoff simulation is superior when using the TOPMODEL-based equations, especially during the rising limb of the autumn hydrograph. A main drawback of the modified VIC-model approach, especially for regional and global application, is that, with five free parameters, considerably more model calibration is required. TOPMODEL, on the other hand, requires only the determination of one free parameter. However, a TOPMODEL approach does require extensive preprocessing of topogr... Abstract Two methods to incorporate subgrid variability in soil moisture and runoff production into soil–vegetation–atmosphere transfer (SVAT) models are compared: 1) the variable infiltration capacity model approach (VIC), and 2) a modified “TOPMODEL” approach. Because neither approach needs to track surface or subsurface flow within a catchment explicitly, they represent computationally efficient ways to represent hydrologic processes within the context of regional and global modeling. This study shows that, during low flow periods, the runoff simulation is superior when using the TOPMODEL-based equations, especially during the rising limb of the autumn hydrograph. A main drawback of the modified VIC-model approach, especially for regional and global application, is that, with five free parameters, considerably more model calibration is required. TOPMODEL, on the other hand, requires only the determination of one free parameter. However, a TOPMODEL approach does require extensive preprocessing of topogr...Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Xinanjiang model applied in ChinaPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- The ARNO rainfall—runoff modelPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Calibration of process-oriented modelsPublished by Elsevier ,2000
- Simulation of the water budget and the river flows of the Rhone basinJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1999
- Regional scale hydrology: II. Application of the VIC-2L model to the Weser River, GermanyHydrological Sciences Journal, 1998
- Regional scale hydrology: I. Formulation of the VIC-2L model coupled to a routing modelHydrological Sciences Journal, 1998
- Application of a macroscale hydrologic model to estimate the water balance of the Arkansas‐Red River BasinJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1996
- Modeling of land surface evaporation by four schemes and comparison with FIFE observationsJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1996
- Land‐atmosphere CO2 exchange simulated by a land surface process model coupled to an atmospheric general circulation modelJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1995
- A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation modelsJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1994