The Problem with Futility
- 4 June 1992
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 326 (23) , 1560-1564
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199206043262310
Abstract
"Futility" is one of the newest additions to the lexicon of bioethics. Physicians, ethicists, and members of the media are increasingly concerned about patients and families who insist on receiving life-sustaining treatment that others judge to be futile. A clear understanding of futility has proved to be elusive, however. Many clinicians view futility the way one judge viewed pornography: they may not be able to define it, but they know it when they see it.1 The notion of futile medical treatment may go back to the time of Hippocrates, who allegedly advised physicians "to refuse to treat those who are . . .Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- At Law: In Re Helga WanglieHastings Center Report, 1991
- Informed Demand for “Non-Beneficial” Medical TreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Guidelines for the appropriate use of do-not-resuscitate orders. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical AssociationPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1991
- Family consent to orders not resuscitate. Reconsidering hospital policyJAMA, 1990
- Physicians' Refusal of Requested TreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- The illusion of futility in clinical practiceThe American Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Do-not-resuscitate orders. Time for reappraisal in long-term-care institutionsJAMA, 1988
- A comparison of patient, family, and physician assessments of the value of medical intensive careCritical Care Medicine, 1988
- Must We Always Use CPR?New England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Survival after Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the HospitalNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983