Modeled Effects of Sagebrush‐Steppe Restoration on Greater Sage‐Grouse in the Interior Columbia Basin, U.S.A.
- 27 September 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Conservation Biology
- Vol. 16 (5) , 1223-1231
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01073.x
Abstract
Habitats of Greater Sage‐Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) have declined across western North America, and most remaining habitats occur on lands administered by the U.S. Forest Service ( FS) and U.S. Bureau of Land Management ( BLM). Consequently, managers of FS–BLM lands need effective strategies to recover sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) habitats on which this species depends. In response to this need, we evaluated the potential benefits of two restoration scenarios on Greater Sage‐Grouse in the interior Columbia Basin and adjacent portions of the Great Basin of the western United States. Scenario 1 assumed a 50% reduction in detrimental grazing effects (through changes in stocking rates and grazing systems) and a six‐fold increase in areas treated with active restoration (e.g., prescribed burning, native seedings, wildfire suppression) compared with future management proposed by the FS–BLM. Scenario 2 assumed a 100% reduction in detrimental grazing effects and the same increase in active restoration as scenario 1. To evaluate benefits, we estimated the risk of population extirpation for sage grouse 100 years in the future under the two scenarios and compared this risk with that estimated for proposed (100‐year) FS–BLM management. We used estimates of extirpation risk for historical (circa 1850–1890) and current time periods as a context for our comparison. Under historical conditions, risk of extirpation was very low on FS–BLM lands, but increased to a moderate probability under current conditions. Under proposed FS–BLM management, risk of extirpation on FS–BLM lands increased to a high probability 100 years in the future. Benefits of the two restoration scenarios, however, constrained the future risk of extirpation to a moderate probability. Our results suggest that expansive and sustained habitat restoration can maintain desired conditions and reduce future extirpation risk for sage grouse on FS–BLM lands in western North America. The continued spread of exotic plants, however, presents a formidable challenge to successful restoration and warrants substantial research and management attention.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing Land-Use Impacts on Bull Trout Using Bayesian Belief NetworksPublished by Springer Nature ,2006
- Performance of Greater Sage-Grouse Models for Conservation Assessment in the Interior Columbia Basin, U.S.A.Conservation Biology, 2002
- Sagebrush‐Steppe Vegetation Dynamics and Restoration Potential in the Interior Columbia Basin, U.S.A.Conservation Biology, 2002
- Using Bayesian belief networks to evaluate fish and wildlife population viability under land management alternatives from an environmental impact statementForest Ecology and Management, 2001
- Trends in terrestrial plant communities and landscape health indicate the effects of alternative management strategies in the interior Columbia River basinForest Ecology and Management, 2001
- Status and trends of habitats of terrestrial vertebrates in relation to land management in the interior Columbia river basinForest Ecology and Management, 2001
- Restoration of degraded lands in the interior Columbia River basin: passive vs. active approachesForest Ecology and Management, 2001
- Source habitats for terrestrial vertebrates of focus in the interior Columbia basin: broadscale trends and management implications. Volume 1—Overview.Published by USDA Forest Service ,2000
- Long‐term changes in sage grouse Centrocercus urophasianus populations in western North AmericaWildlife Biology, 1997