The impact of a closed-loop electronic prescribing and administration system on prescribing errors, administration errors and staff time: a before-and-after study
Top Cited Papers
- 1 August 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Quality and Safety in Health Care
- Vol. 16 (4) , 279-284
- https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2006.019497
Abstract
To assess the impact of a closed-loop electronic prescribing, automated dispensing, barcode patient identification and electronic medication administration record (EMAR) system on prescribing and administration errors, confirmation of patient identity before administration, and staff time. Before-and-after study in a surgical ward of a teaching hospital, involving patients and staff of that ward. Closed-loop electronic prescribing, automated dispensing, barcode patient identification and EMAR system. Percentage of new medication orders with a prescribing error, percentage of doses with medication administration errors (MAEs) and percentage given without checking patient identity. Time spent prescribing and providing a ward pharmacy service. Nursing time on medication tasks. Prescribing errors were identified in 3.8% of 2450 medication orders pre-intervention and 2.0% of 2353 orders afterwards (p<0.001; chi(2) test). MAEs occurred in 7.0% of 1473 non-intravenous doses pre-intervention and 4.3% of 1139 afterwards (p = 0.005; chi(2) test). Patient identity was not checked for 82.6% of 1344 doses pre-intervention and 18.9% of 1291 afterwards (p<0.001; chi(2) test). Medical staff required 15 s to prescribe a regular inpatient drug pre-intervention and 39 s afterwards (p = 0.03; t test). Time spent providing a ward pharmacy service increased from 68 min to 98 min each weekday (p = 0.001; t test); 22% of drug charts were unavailable pre-intervention. Time per drug administration round decreased from 50 min to 40 min (p = 0.006; t test); nursing time on medication tasks outside of drug rounds increased from 21.1% to 28.7% (p = 0.006; chi(2) test). A closed-loop electronic prescribing, dispensing and barcode patient identification system reduced prescribing errors and MAEs, and increased confirmation of patient identity before administration. Time spent on medication-related tasks increased.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Qualitative evaluation of an electronic prescribing and administration systemQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2007
- Improving prescribing using a rule based prescribing systemQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2004
- Ethnographic study of incidence and severity of intravenous drug errorsBMJ, 2003
- Prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: their incidence and clinical significanceQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2002
- Improving the safety of health care: the leapfrog initiative.2001
- What is a prescribing error?Quality and Safety in Health Care, 2000
- Implementation of rules based computerised bedside prescribing and administration: intervention studyBMJ, 2000
- Drug-Related Problems in Hospitalised PatientsDrug Safety, 2000
- A validated, reliable method of scoring the severity of medication errorsAmerican Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 1999
- A comparison of handwritten and computer-assisted prescriptions in an intensive care unitCritical Care, 1998