Instruments as agents: on the nature of semantic relations
- 1 March 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Linguistics
- Vol. 25 (1) , 189-210
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700012147
Abstract
There is a widespread current assumption that the semantic relations underlying linguistic constructions reflect the way human beings ineluctably, and hence universally, perceive events and situations. This assumption will be questioned in this paper. To make the point, a linguistic construction purportedly expressing the instrumental case will be examined. It will be convenient here to juxtapose my treatment of this construction with the one proposed by case grammarians, and by Fillmore in particular. However, the discussion has implications for semantic relations in any linguistic theory, whether they appear there as semantic roles, thematic relations, theta roles, or whatever. These implications will be discussed in the final section.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Women, Fire, and Dangerous ThingsPublished by University of Chicago Press ,1987
- Notes on Agentivity and CausationStudies in Language. International Journal Sponsored By the Foundation “foundations of Language”, 1984
- SyntaxPublished by John Benjamins Publishing Company ,1984
- Cognitive structures and semantic deep structures: the case of the instrumentalJournal of Linguistics, 1979
- The Case for Case ReopenedPublished by Brill ,1977
- Some postulates characterizing volitive NPsJournal of Linguistics, 1974
- The Instrumental Case in EnglishPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1973
- Some thoughts on agentivityJournal of Linguistics, 1973
- Introduction to Theoretical LinguisticsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1968
- Toward a Science of TranslatingPublished by Brill ,1964