A Randomized Trial of Therapies for Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Artery Disease
Top Cited Papers
- 11 June 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 360 (24) , 2503-2515
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0805796
Abstract
Optimal treatment for patients with both type 2 diabetes mellitus and stable ischemic heart disease has not been established. We randomly assigned 2368 patients with both type 2 diabetes and heart disease to undergo either prompt revascularization with intensive medical therapy or intensive medical therapy alone and to undergo either insulin-sensitization or insulin-provision therapy. Primary end points were the rate of death and a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (major cardiovascular events). Randomization was stratified according to the choice of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) as the more appropriate intervention. At 5 years, rates of survival did not differ significantly between the revascularization group (88.3%) and the medical-therapy group (87.8%, P=0.97) or between the insulin-sensitization group (88.2%) and the insulin-provision group (87.9%, P=0.89). The rates of freedom from major cardiovascular events also did not differ significantly among the groups: 77.2% in the revascularization group and 75.9% in the medical-treatment group (P=0.70) and 77.7% in the insulin-sensitization group and 75.4% in the insulin-provision group (P=0.13). In the PCI stratum, there was no significant difference in primary end points between the revascularization group and the medical-therapy group. In the CABG stratum, the rate of major cardiovascular events was significantly lower in the revascularization group (22.4%) than in the medical-therapy group (30.5%, P=0.01; P=0.002 for interaction between stratum and study group). Adverse events and serious adverse events were generally similar among the groups, although severe hypoglycemia was more frequent in the insulin-provision group (9.2%) than in the insulin-sensitization group (5.9%, P=0.003). Overall, there was no significant difference in the rates of death and major cardiovascular events between patients undergoing prompt revascularization and those undergoing medical therapy or between strategies of insulin sensitization and insulin provision. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00006305.)Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factors Related to the Selection of Surgical Versus Percutaneous Revascularization in Diabetic Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease in the BARI 2D (Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation in Type 2 Diabetes) TrialJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2009
- Percutaneous coronary interventions for non-acute coronary artery disease: a quantitative 20-year synopsis and a network meta-analysisThe Lancet, 2009
- Glucose Control and Vascular Complications in Veterans with Type 2 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Baseline characteristics of patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease enrolled in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trialAmerican Heart Journal, 2008
- Intensive Blood Glucose Control and Vascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Effects of Intensive Glucose Lowering in Type 2 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Effect of a Multifactorial Intervention on Mortality in Type 2 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Rationale for the Revascularization Arm of the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) TrialThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2006
- Modifications of Coronary Risk FactorsPublished by Elsevier ,2006
- Hypotheses, Design, and Methods for the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) TrialThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2006