COMPARATIVE CONTROLLED TRIAL OF LOW-DOSE WEEKLY METHOTREXATE VERSUS AZATHIOPRINE IN RHUEMATIOD ARTHRITIS: 3-YEAR PROSPECTIVE STUDY
- 1 April 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Rheumatology
- Vol. 29 (2) , 120-125
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/29.2.120
Abstract
Fifty-three patients with rheumatoid arthritis who required immunosuppressive therapy were commenced in a randomized trial comparing azathioprine to weekly oral pulse ethotrexate. After an initial 24-week period, both groups had significantly improved from baseline measures of pain and functional capacity and there were no significant ifferences in clinical outcomes between the two groups. Laboratory variables of disease activity showed a significant improvement in haemoglobin and ESR in the methotrexate group. Subsequently, the patients were followed for up to 3 years. After one year, more than half of the patients in both groups had discontinued therapy due to inefficacy or adverse events. Adverse effects were more frequent in the patients treated with ethotrexate, but withdrawal rates were similar in both groups. From these data, the probability of a patient continuing therapy with either agent for reater than 18 months is low.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of low‐dose oral pulse methotrexate and placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. A Controlled Clinical TrialArthritis & Rheumatism, 1985
- PRACTICAL RESULTS OF TREATMENT WITH DISEASE-MODIFYING ANTIRHEUMATOID DRUGSRheumatology, 1985
- Efficacy of Low-Dose Methotrexate in Rheumatoid ArthritisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Cultured Human Cells with A High Content of Metallothionein Show Resistance Against Gold-ChlorideScandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, 1983
- Measurement of patient outcome in arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1980