Poverty Measurement and the Within-Household Distribution: Agenda for Action
- 1 October 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Social Policy
- Vol. 20 (4) , 457-483
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279400019760
Abstract
Mainsteam poverty analysis is deficient because it ignores important within-household aspects. This point has been made by many, and stressed by feminists especially, yet mainstream poverty measurement practice remains unchanged. Why is this? What should we be doing? This paper examines anew the case for taking within-household factors into account in poverty measurement. The analysis reveals a number of unresolved issues including some problems with recent feminist arguments, but concludes that there is a good case for changing current practice. To demonstrate that this is feasible, four research projects are described. These are my agenda for action.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Intrafamily Allocation of Goods-How to Separate the Adult from the ChildJournal of Labor Economics, 1991
- Counting People with Low Incomes: the Impact of Recent Changes in Official StatisticsFiscal Studies, 1989
- Gender and PovertyJournal of Social Policy, 1989
- THE DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME AND WORKOxford Review of Economic Policy, 1987
- His and Hers: Gender Differences in Work and Income, 1959-1979Journal of Labor Economics, 1986
- Comment on Lazear and MichaelJournal of Labor Economics, 1986
- Estimating the Personal Distribution of Income with Adjustment for within- Family VariationJournal of Labor Economics, 1986
- The Allocation of Money and the Structuring of Inequality within MarriageSociological Review, 1983
- Patterns of Income and Expenditure within FamiliesJournal of Social Policy, 1982
- Family Income Distribution: Explanation and Policy EvaluationJournal of Political Economy, 1979