Aristotle's Understanding of the Naturalness of the City
- 1 April 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Review of Politics
- Vol. 47 (2) , 163-185
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034670500036688
Abstract
The characteristically Aristotelian defense of the city's authority over its members is summarized in the statements “every city exists by nature” and “man is by nature a political animal.” These doctrines distinguish Aristotle not only from such of his predecessors as the Sophists and Plato but also from two leading schools of contemporary political thought, liberalism and Marxism. Aspiring to assess the merits of Aristotle's unique approach to the problem of political authority, this paper examines Aristotle's teaching on the relationship between nature and the city. This relationship is shown to be far more complex than is implied in the doctrine that the city is natural. I conclude by wondering why Aristotle addressed the problem of political authority with a doctrine he shows to be merely provisional and why he addressed it with this particular provisional doctrine.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Aristotle's Theory of Natural SlaveryPhoenix, 1983
- Response to HallPolitical Theory, 1977
- Aims and Methods in Aristotle's PoliticsThe Classical Quarterly, 1977
- Rational Animal-Political Animal: Nature and Convention in Human Speech and PoliticsThe Review of Politics, 1976