Area disadvantage, individual socio-economic position, and premature cancer mortality in Australia 1998 to 2000: a multilevel analysis
- 20 November 2007
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Cancer Causes & Control
- Vol. 19 (2) , 183-193
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-007-9084-7
Abstract
To examine associations between area and individual socio-economic characteristics and premature cancer mortality using multilevel analysis. We modeled cancer mortality among 25–64-year-old men and women (n = 16,340) between 1998 and 2000 in Australia. Socio-economic characteristics of Statistical Local Areas (n = 1,317) were measured using an Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage (quintiles), and individual socio-economic position was measured by occupation (professionals, white and blue collar). After adjustment for within-area variation in age and occupation, the probability of premature cancer mortality was highest in the most disadvantaged areas for all-cancer mortality for men (RR 1.48 95% CI 1.35–1.63) and women (RR 1.30 95% CI 1.18–1.43) and for lung cancer mortality for men (1.91 95% CI 1.63–2.25) and women (1.51 95% CI 1.04–2.18). Men in blue collar occupations had a higher rate of cancer mortality (RR 1.57 95% CI 1.50–1.65) and lung cancer mortality (RR 2.31 95 % CI 2.09–2.56), whereas men in white collar occupations had a lower all-cancer mortality rate (RR 0.78 95% CI 0.72–0.85). Compared with professionals, women in white collar occupations had an all-cancer mortality rate that was lower (RR 0.85 95% CI 0.80–0.90). When deaths from breast cancer were excluded, women in blue collar occupations had a significantly higher all-cancer mortality rate than professionals (RR 1.12 95% CI 1.02–1.22). Area disadvantage and individual socio-economic position were independently associated with premature cancer mortality, suggesting that interventions to reduce inequalities should focus on places and people.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Socioeconomic inequality of cancer mortality in the United States: a spatial data mining approachInternational Journal of Health Geographics, 2006
- Colorectal cancer surgical care and survival: do private health insurance, socioeconomic and locational status make a difference?Anz Journal of Surgery, 2005
- Prostate cancer: socio‐economic, geographical and private‐health insurance effects on care and survivalBJU International, 2004
- The influence of socio-economic and locational disadvantage on survival after a diagnosis of lung or breast cancer in Western AustraliaJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2004
- Social inequalities in cancer survivalPopulation Studies, 2000
- Socioeconomic status, social mobility and cancer occurrence during working life: a case–control study among French electricity and gas workersCancer Causes & Control, 1999
- The late-stage diagnosis of colorectal cancer: demographic and socioeconomic factors.American Journal of Public Health, 1996
- Mortality and Socio-economic Status Among Finnish WomenPopulation Studies, 1995
- EFFECT OF PSYCHOSOCIAL TREATMENT ON SURVIVAL OF PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC BREAST CANCERThe Lancet, 1989
- THE ECOLOGICAL FALLACYAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1988