Endocervical Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection in Pregnancy: Direct Test and Clinico‐Sociodemographic Survey of Pregnant Patients at the Port Moresby General Hospital Antenatal Clinic to Determine Prevalence and Risk Markers
- 13 February 1992
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 32 (1) , 43-46
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828x.1992.tb01897.x
Abstract
EDITORIAL COMMENT: Chlamydia trachomatis causes symptomatic and asymptomatic infections which in pregnant women have been linked to chorioamnionitis, premature rupture of the membranes and premature labour (A). Chlamydial infection is easily treated (by erythromycin) but recognition requires screening. This study has shown that this means screening the entire population, since clinical methods are unable to identify a high risk group. Screening for C. trachomatis is reported to be cost‐effective when the prevalence of the infection exceeds 6% (B), as it did in the present study, and in studies reported in this journal from Saudi Arabia (1987; 27:126 ‐ antenatal incidence 12.6%) and Fiji (1987; 27: 213 ‐ antenatal incidence 38–50%). The standard antenatal investigations recommended in Australia do not include testing for C trachomatis. Readers are referred to the recently available compendium produced by the Royal Australian College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists which includes a section on routine screening in pregnancy and lists those investigations generally accepted as necessary and also those frequently done in certain groups of patients.A. The Chlamydia Challenge. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164: 6: 2: 1776–1796.B. Nettleman MD, Bell TA. Cost‐effectiveness of prenatal testing for Chlamydial trachomatis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164: 5: 1: 1289–1294.Summary The prevalence of endocervical C. trachomatis infection in 181 consecutive antenatal clinic patients at the first attendance and who had not received antibiotic therapy in the previous 4 weeks, was 17.7%. The direct fluorescent antibody test was used for diagnosis. There was no significant clinical or sociodemographic factor which distinguished patients who tested positive from those who tested negative.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficacy of Neonatal Ocular Prophylaxis for the Prevention of Chlamydial and Gonococcal ConjunctivitisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Chlamydia trachomatis among sexually active teenage girls. Lack of correlation between chlamydial infection, history of the patient and clinical signs of infectionBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1988
- The Prevalence of Sexually Transmitted Disease Agents in Pregnant Women in SuvaAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1987
- Prospective study of perinatal transmission of Chlamydia trachomatisJAMA, 1986
- Criteria for selective screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women attending family planning clinicsJAMA, 1986
- WORLDWIDE PATTERNS OF INFERTILITY: IS AFRICA DIFFERENT?Published by Elsevier ,1985
- EPIDEMIOLOGY OF SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED CHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATIS INFECTIONSEpidemiologic Reviews, 1983
- Infection with Chlamydia trachomatis: Involvement of Multiple Anatomic Sites in NeonatesThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1979
- Placentitis and Abortion in Cattle Inoculated with Chlamydiae Isolated from Aborted Human Placental TissueExperimental Biology and Medicine, 1974