Disability prevention and communication among workers, physicians, employers, and insurers—current models and opportunities for improvement
- 3 June 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Disability and Rehabilitation
- Vol. 26 (11) , 625-634
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280410001672517
Abstract
To review prevailing models of disability management and prevention with respect to communication, and to suggest alternative approaches. Review of selected articles. Effective disability management and return to work strategies have been the focus of an increasing number of intervention programmes and associated research studies, spanning a variety of worker populations and provider and business perspectives. Although primary and secondary disability prevention approaches have addressed theoretical basis, methods and costs, few identify communication as a key factor influencing disability outcomes. Four prevailing models of disability management and prevention (medical model, physical rehabilitation model, job-match model, and managed care model) are identified. The medical model emphasizes the physician's role to define functional limitations and job restrictions. In the physical rehabilitation model, rehabilitation professionals communicate the importance of exercise and muscle reconditioning for resuming normal work activities. The job-match model relies on the ability of employers to accurately communicate physical job requirements. The managed care model focuses on dissemination of acceptable standards for medical treatment and duration of work absence, and interventions by case managers when these standards are exceeded. Despite contrary evidence for many health impairments, these models share a common assumption that medical disability outcomes are highly predictable and unaffected by either individual or contextual factors. As a result, communication is often authoritative and unidirectional, with workers and employers in a passive role. Improvements in communication may be responsible for successes across a variety of new interventions. Communication-based interventions may further improve disability outcomes, reduce adversarial relationships, and prove cost-effective; however, controlled trials are needed.Keywords
This publication has 72 references indexed in Scilit:
- The interplay between education and research about patient–provider communicationPatient Education and Counseling, 2003
- The concerns and issues of injured workers in relation to claims/injury management and rehabilitation: the need for new operational frameworksDisability and Rehabilitation, 2003
- Implementation Barriers for General Practice Guidelines on Low Back PainSpine, 2001
- Evaluation of the Washington State Workers' Compensation Managed Care Pilot Project IMedical Care, 1999
- A Study of Doctors' and Patients' Communication During a Primary Care Consultation: Implications for Communication TrainingJournal of Health Communication, 1997
- Occupational Medicine Practice GuidelinesJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1997
- Living systems theory as a paradigm for organizational behavior: Understanding humans, organizations, and social processesBehavioral Science, 1996
- Validity of Patient Reporting and Predictive Value of Industrial Physical Work DemandsSpine, 1994
- Arthritis Education: Opportunities and State of the ArtHealth Education Quarterly, 1993
- Exposure to neurotoxic metals among workers in Singapore: an overviewOccupational Medicine, 1993