Assessing the Differences in Public Health Impact of Salmonella Subtypes Using a Bayesian Microbial Subtyping Approach for Source Attribution
- 1 February 2010
- journal article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Foodborne Pathogens & Disease
- Vol. 7 (2) , 143-151
- https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2009.0369
Abstract
Salmonella is a major cause of human gastroenteritis worldwide. To prioritize interventions and assess the effectiveness of efforts to reduce illness, it is important to attribute salmonellosis to the responsible sources. Studies have suggested that some Salmonella subtypes have a higher health impact than others. Likewise, some food sources appear to have a higher impact than others. Knowledge of variability in the impact of subtypes and sources may provide valuable added information for research, risk management, and public health strategies. We developed a Bayesian model that attributes illness to specific sources and allows for a better estimation of the differences in the ability of Salmonella subtypes and food types to result in reported salmonellosis. The model accommodates data for multiple years and is based on the Danish Salmonella surveillance. The number of sporadic cases caused by different Salmonella subtypes is estimated as a function of the prevalence of these subtypes in the animal-food sources, the amount of food consumed, subtype-related factors, and source-related factors. Our results showed relative differences between Salmonella subtypes in their ability to cause disease. These differences presumably represent multiple factors, such as differences in survivability through the food chain and/or pathogenicity. The relative importance of the source-dependent factors varied considerably over the years, reflecting, among others, variability in the surveillance programs for the different animal sources. The presented model requires estimation of fewer parameters than a previously developed model, and thus allows for a better estimation of these factors to result in reported human disease. In addition, a comparison of the results of the same model using different sets of typing data revealed that the model can be applied to data with less discriminatory power, which is the only data available in many countries. In conclusion, the model allows for the estimation of relative differences between Salmonella subtypes and sources, providing results that will benefit future risk assessment or risk ranking purposes.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Salmonellosis Outcomes Differ Substantially by SerotypeThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2008
- The Attribution of Human Infections with Antimicrobial ResistantSalmonellaBacteria in Denmark to Sources of Animal OriginFoodborne Pathogens & Disease, 2007
- A recurring salmonellosis epidemic in New Zealand linked to contact with sheepEpidemiology and Infection, 2006
- Web-based Surveillance and GlobalSalmonellaDistribution, 2000–2002Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2006
- Attributing Illness to FoodEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2005
- InternationalSalmonellaTyphimurium DT104 Infections, 1992–2001Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2005
- A Bayesian Approach to Quantify the Contribution of Animal‐Food Sources to Human SalmonellosisRisk Analysis, 2004
- Short and long term mortality associated with foodborne bacterial gastrointestinal infections: registry based study * Commentary: matched cohorts can be usefulBMJ, 2003
- Food-Related Illness and Death in the United StatesEmerging Infectious Diseases, 1999
- Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple SequencesStatistical Science, 1992