Understanding Canonical Correlation through the General Linear Model and Principal Components
- 1 November 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The American Statistician
- Vol. 36 (4) , 342-354
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1982.10483045
Abstract
Canonical correlation has been little used and little understood, even by otherwise sophisticated analysts. An alternative approach to canonical correlation, based on a general linear multivariate model, is presented. Properties of principal component analysis are used to help explain the method. Standard computational methods for full rank canonical correlation, techniques for canonical correlation on component scores, and canonical correlation with less than full rank are discussed. They are seen to be essentially equivalent when the model equation for canonical correlation on component scores is presented. The two approaches to less than full rank situations are equivalent in some senses, but quite different in usefulness, depending on the application. An example dataset is analyzed in detail to help demonstrate the conclusions.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- The maximum‐likelihood solution in inter‐battery factor analysisBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1979
- Some Symmetric, Invariant Measures of Multivariate AssociationPsychometrika, 1979
- Canonical Analysis and Factor ComparisonPublished by SAGE Publications ,1977
- A Note on Multiple and Canonical Correlation for a Singular Covariance MatrixPsychometrika, 1976
- On choosing a test statistic in multivariate analysis of variance.Psychological Bulletin, 1976
- Linear Statistical Inference and its ApplicationsPublished by Wiley ,1973
- Objective identification of strategy on a selection concept learning task.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971
- INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL FACTOR ANALYSISBritish Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1948
- RELATIONS BETWEEN TWO SETS OF VARIATESBiometrika, 1936
- The most predictable criterion.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1935