Conventional vs. Liposomal Amphotericin B in Immunosuppressed Children
Open Access
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- letter
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Pediatric Hematology and Oncology
- Vol. 9 (2) , 187-190
- https://doi.org/10.3109/08880019209018337
Abstract
Invasive fungal infections, mostly caused by Candida and Aspergillus species, are a major cause of early morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised children. 1,2 The treatment of choice for systemic fungal infections is still the early intravenous administration of amphotericin B. 3 However, conventional AMB therapy is often limited by severe side effects such as fever, chills, bronchospasm, and nephrotoxicity. 2 In recent reports liposomal AMB (AmBisome) was shown to be effective in the treatment of severe systemic fungal infections. 4,5 So far, clinical experience with AmBisome in children is still anecdotal and no comparative study is yet available. In the following we report on 11 immunosuppressed children who were treated with conventional or liposomal AMB for longer than 3 weeks.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Liposomal amphotericin‐B (AmBisome)® treatment in solid organ and bone marrow transplant recipients. Efficacy and safety evaluationClinical Transplantation, 1990
- New Methods for Delivery of Antifungal AgentsClinical Infectious Diseases, 1989
- Treatment of hepatosplenic candidiasis with liposomal-amphotericin B.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1987
- Fungal Infections in the Immunocompromised Host CATHERINE HAWKINSClinics in Haematology, 1984
- Liposomal amphotericin B is toxic to fungal cells but not to mammalian cellsBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, 1984