Ineffective transcutaneous nerve stimulation following epidural anaesthesia
- 1 April 1982
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Anaesthesia
- Vol. 37 (4) , 453-457
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1982.tb01159.x
Abstract
Thirty-five patients were delivered by electric Caesarean section under general or epidural anaesthesia. For postoperative analgesia they received narcotic analgesics as required and either transcutaneous nerve stimulation or an inactive stimulator. The patients receiving an active stimulator following general anaesthesia had significantly less pain and required significantly less postoperative analgesia than their control group. The epidural patients did not receive any additional benefit from active stimulation, but had the same amount of pain and the same analgesic requirement as patients receiving active stimulation following general anaesthesia. The possible causes for the failure of transcutaneous nerve stimulation after epidural anaesthesia and their implications are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating painAnaesthesia, 1976
- Electrical stimulation in the nervous system: The current status of electrical stimulation of the nervous system for relief of painPain, 1975
- Lidocaine Blocking Concentrations for B- and C-Nerve FibersAnesthesiology, 1974
- Mechanisms for differential block among single myelinated and non‐myelinated axons by procaineThe Journal of Physiology, 1974
- The Inhibition of Sodium Currents in Myelinated Nerve by Quaternary Derivatives of LidocaineThe Journal of general physiology, 1973
- Temporary Abolition of Pain in ManScience, 1967
- Pain Mechanisms: A New TheoryScience, 1965
- Some factors concerned in differential nerve block by local anaestheticsThe Journal of Physiology, 1961
- The cytoarchitectonic organization of the spinal cord in the catJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1952