REST AND EXERCISE HEMODYNAMICS FOLLOWING AORTIC-VALVE REPLACEMENT - A COMPARISON BETWEEN 19 AND 21 MM IONESCU-SHILEY PERICARDIAL AND CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PORCINE VALVES
- 1 January 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Vol. 90 (5) , 750-755
Abstract
When aortic valve replacement is performed in a patient with a small anulus, significant obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract may remain. Most prostheses are obstructive in the smaller sizes, and enlargement of the aortic anulus may be required to allow placement of a larger valve. To evaluate the hemodynamic performance of two commonly used tissues prostheses, the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier-Edwards porcine valves, 22 patients with either the 19 or 21 mm size were electively studied at rest and after exercise at a mean of 15 months after operation. The resting mean transvalvular gradient for 19 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valves (n = 7), 10.6 .+-. 9.2 mm Hg, was significantly lower than that for 19 mm Carpentier-Edwards valves (n = 3), 33.3 .+-. 2.1 mm Hg, p < 0.01. Following exercise, the mean gradient for 19 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valves rose only to 13.8 .+-. 8.5 mm Hg. No exercise data were available for the 19 mm Carpentier-Edwards valve. Among patients with 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valves (n = 7), the mean transvalvular gradient at rest was 5.6 .+-. 9.5 mm Hg, not significantly different from that of patients with 21 mm Carpentier-Edwards valves (n = 5), 9.8 .+-. 18.3 mm Hg. After exercise, the gradients rose to 16.0 .+-. 10.0 mm Hg and 25.5 .+-. 23.8 mm Hg for the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier-Edwards valves, respectively (no statistical significance). Cardial index was not different between groups. Gradients were not significantly higher in patients with body surface areas greater than 1.5 m2. It is concluded that the 19 and 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valves possess excellent hemodynamics, even after exercise. This valve appears hemodynamically superior to the Carpentier-Edwards valve, particularly in the 19 mm size. Procedures to enlarge the aortic anulus are usually unnecessary when small Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valves are used, even in patients who have large body surface areas.This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hemodynamic evaluation of the Carpentier-Edwards porcine xenograft.Circulation, 1979
- Surgical Management of the Small Aortic AnnulusChest, 1978
- The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch.Circulation, 1978
- Long-term haemodynamic evaluation of aortic pericardial xenograft.Heart, 1978
- Results of aortoventriculoplasty in 21 consecutive patients with left ventricular outflow tract obstructionThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1978
- Hemodynamic assessment of Lillehei-Kaster tilting disc aortic and mitral prosthesesThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1978
- Hemodynamic and clinical evaluation of the Hancock xenograft bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement (with emphasis on management of the small aortic root)The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1978
- Hemodynamic results of aortic valvular replacement with the porcine xenograft valve.Circulation, 1977
- Heart valve replacement with the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograftThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1977
- AORTOVENTRICULOPLASTY - NEW TECHNIQUE FOR TREATMENT OF LEFT-VENTRICULAR OUTFLOW TRACT OBSTRUCTION1976