Research Misconduct and Crime Lessons from Criminal Science on Preventing Misconduct and Promoting Integrity
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Accountability in Research
- Vol. 12 (3) , 225-240
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08989620500217495
Abstract
For 200 years, criminologists theorized that delinquent and criminal acts arise from deviant psychological states (such as irrationality or immorality) and/or social conditions that produce these psychological states. This theoretical perspective, which is being duplicated in most efforts to understand and control research misconduct, has not been productive. More recently, criminological perspectives have emerged, emphasizing situational factors that enhance or restrict the opportunity for illegal or imprudent behavior. These so-called "opportunity" theories have been shown to have practical value in reducing crime rates. We explore the promise of these newer theories for the responsible conduct of research (RCR).Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fifth International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical PublicationJAMA, 2003
- Routine Activities and Individual Deviant BehaviorAmerican Sociological Review, 1996
- A General Theory of CrimePublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1990
- The Reasoning CriminalPublished by Springer Nature ,1986
- Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity ApproachAmerican Sociological Review, 1979
- Police Discretion Not to Invoke the Criminal Process: Low-Visibility Decisions in the Administration of JusticeThe Yale Law Journal, 1960
- Social Structure and AnomieAmerican Sociological Review, 1938