Why you should not use ‘Hybrid’, ‘Power‐Law’ or related exponential schemes for convective modelling—there are much better alternatives
- 30 March 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids
- Vol. 20 (6) , 421-442
- https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.1650200602
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Editorial Policy Statement on Numerical Accuracy and Experimental UncertaintyAIAA Journal, 1994
- EditorialJournal of Fluids Engineering, 1993
- Numerical Uncertainty in Fluid Flow Calculations: Needs for Future ResearchJournal of Fluids Engineering, 1993
- Beyond first‐order upwinding: The ultra‐sharp alternative for non‐oscillatory steady‐state simulation of convectionInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1990
- Simple high‐accuracy resolution program for convective modelling of discontinuitiesInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 1988
- Curvature‐compensated convective transport: SMART, A new boundedness‐ preserving transport algorithmInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 1988
- Natural convection in a shallow cavityJournal of Fluid Mechanics, 1987
- A consistency check for estimating truncation error due to upstream differencingApplied Mathematical Modelling, 1978
- Stability of natural convection in a vertical slotJournal of Fluid Mechanics, 1969
- RELAXATION METHODS APPLIED TO DETERMINE THE MOTION, IN TWO DIMENSIONS, OF A VISCOUS FLUID PAST A FIXED CYLINDERThe Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, 1955