Understanding the State in South Korea
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Comparative Political Studies
- Vol. 24 (4) , 512-531
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414092024004005
Abstract
South Korea cannot be seen as an example of the bureaucratic-authoritarian state type. Neither its position in the world system nor its industrialization strategy can be used to give a sufficient explanation of its political and social character. Although these factors have played a part, particular historical, political, and cultural circumstances have permitted the state to enjoy a degree of autonomy during the period of rapid social and economic transformation from the 1960s to the 1980s. The determinants and character of the transition to democratization generally support this analysis, but also indicate that limits exist to the degree of liberalization to be expected in the political system.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- IntroductionThe China Quarterly, 2000
- The East Asian NICs in Comparative PerspectiveThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1989
- Democratizing the Quasi-Leninist Regime in TaiwanWorld Politics, 1989
- From Authoritarianism to Democracy in South KoreaPolitical Studies, 1989
- South Korean democratization: The role of economic developmentThe Pacific Review, 1989
- Democracy in Developing Countries: Volume 3, Asia.Published by JSTOR ,1989
- Paradigm Lost: Dependence to DemocracyWorld Politics, 1988
- The Rise and Limits of the East Asian NICsPacific Focus, 1987
- The Rise of Bureaucratic Authoritarianism in South KoreaWorld Politics, 1987
- The origins and development of the Northeast Asian political economy: industrial sectors, product cycles, and political consequencesInternational Organization, 1984