CROSS‐CULTURAL DIFFERENCES: INDIVIDUAL‐LEVEL VS. CULTURE‐LEVEL ANALYSIS
- 1 December 1989
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 24 (6) , 703-719
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00207598908247840
Abstract
Two approaches to the interpretation of and theorizing about cross‐cultural differences are identified. In the individual‐level approach, cultural differences are assumed to be consistent with individual differences within each of the cultures included in the cross‐cultural comparison. The use of antecedent variables to eliminate alternative explanations based on biases is reviewed and some problems noted. It is suggested that explicit theories be used to guide the selection of antecedent variables to minimize the impact of cultural biases. In the second approach, the culture‐level approach, culture is the unit of analysis and there is no assumption regarding the correspondence between culture‐ and individual‐level relationships. Two examples are given to illustrate the potential usefulness of this approach to developing concepts and theories that are very different from those derived from the individual‐level approach. The problems of bias in this level of analysis are also discussed. Finally, it is argued that in cross‐cultural psychology the individual‐level approach dominates, but we should pay more attention to culture‐level research. This approach may lead to the development of concepts and theories that are not likely to be produced by mono‐cultural works.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Explaining Cross-Cultural DifferencesJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1987
- Leadership Convergence: An Application of Within and Between to ValidityApplied Psychological Measurement, 1983
- Theory and method in cross-cultural psychology.American Psychologist, 1977
- High School Context Effects on AspirationsSociology of Education, 1977
- PROBLEMS OF MEASUREMENT IN CROSS‐CULTURAL RESEARCHAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1977
- ON THE NEED FOR EXPERIMENTATION IN CROSS‐CULTURAL RESEARCHAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1977
- Toward a normative and comparative biocultural social psychology.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976
- The Relationship of Test Familiarity to Extreme Response Styles in Bedouin and Moroccan BoysJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1976
- The Between and Within of Cross‐Cultural ResearchEthos, 1973
- Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of IndividualsAmerican Sociological Review, 1950