Response of the normal human ankle joint to imposed sinusoidal movements.
- 1 November 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Physiology
- Vol. 344 (1) , 483-502
- https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014953
Abstract
Ankle joints were subjected to sinusoidal movements at a range of amplitudes and frequencies. Records were made of electromyograms (emg) in calf muscles, and of the forces at the joints. When the leg is relaxed, the ankle joint resists an imposed sinusoidal movement with a small, approximately sinusoidal force. It is stiffer in its resistance to small movements than to large ones, and this resistance is greater when the joint is dorsiflexed than when it is plantarflexed. If the subject exerts a steady mean flexing force, the imposed sinusoidal movement generates reflex activity which may be recorded as a modulation of the gastrocnemius and soleus emg. The emg response to the sinusoidal movement occurs later in cycles of movement at high than at low frequencies, as could be expected of a reflex pathway that involves a delay. This delay apparently is between 50 and 60 ms, and under these circumstances spinal stretch reflexes are playing the important part. The relation of the resisting force to the movement was displayed as a vector. As the frequency changes, this vector describes the circular path that is characteristic of a system which includes delays or lags; this path enables one to draw conclusions about the amplitude and timing of the reflex resistance to the movement. When a subject exerts a moderate flexing force against the sinusoidal movement for some minutes, the reflex response becomes progressively potentiated. A subject whose reflex responses are normally slight may then exhibit a vigorous reflex response to the movement of that ankle. This enhancement of spinal reflex activity was accompanied by an increase in the myotatic reflex response at the ankle. Reflex responses to sinusoidal movement were most clearly seen when the subject exerted a mean flexing force that amounted to about 1/5 of his maximum. Very small movements (.+-. 0.5.degree.) generated little or no reflex response. With large amplitudes of movement there was more reflex activity, but at some amplitude (which varied from subject to subject and from time to time) the reflex mechanism appeared to saturate, and further increases in amplitude were not accompanied by comparable increases in the reflex response. With movements of 10-15 Hz the emg response of became large in alternate cycles, with less activity in the intervening cycles. In extreme cases emg activity was confined to alternate cycles, with electrical silence in the intervening ones. This alternation of the emg signal was usually accompanied by similar changes in the force records, so that each cycle with vigorous emg activity was followed by one in which the force rose to a high level.This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effects of load and force on tremor at the normal human elbow jointThe Journal of Physiology, 1974
- Discharge patterns of soleus motor units with associated changes in force exerted by foot during quiet stance in man.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1973
- Observations on the control of stepping and hopping movements in manThe Journal of Physiology, 1971
- The response of α-motoneurones of the cat to sinusoidal movements of the muscles they innervateBrain Research, 1971
- Quantitative description of linear behavior of mammalian muscle spindles.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1970
- The sensitivity of muscle spindle afferents to small sinusoidal changes of lengthThe Journal of Physiology, 1969
- Normal variability of tonic vibration reflexes in manExperimental Neurology, 1966
- Frequency stabilization in the motor centers of spinal cord and caudal brain stemAmerican Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1966
- The reflex response to sinusoidal stretching of soleus in the decerebrate catThe Journal of Physiology, 1966
- The behaviour of a mammalian muscle during sinusoidal stretchingThe Journal of Physiology, 1966