Observer Error in Systolic Blood Pressure Measurement in the Elderly
- 1 December 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of internal medicine (1960)
- Vol. 146 (12) , 2373-2376
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1986.00360240099017
Abstract
• Measurement of systolic blood pressure (BP) in the elderly can be inaccurate due to observer errors such as terminal digit preference and expectation bias. Efforts to reduce these errors include use of trained observers, random-zero sphygmomanometers, and automatic BP recorders. To evaluate the value of an infrasonic recorder, the Infrasonde, we compared simultaneous systolic BP determinations obtained directly by intraarterial measurements, and indirectly by a standard cuffmercury sphygmomanometer using clinic nurses (casual and serial measurements), a trained physician assistant (PA), and the Infrasonde in 36 elderly hypertensive men. All the indirect measurements correlated positively with the direct measurement. A terminal digit preference for zero occurred more frequently in the casual and serial readings compared with the Infrasonde and PA cuff readings: 45% and 51% vs 21% and 22%, respectively. Our data suggest that the Infrasonde is a reliable, alternative device for systolic BP measurement that eliminates observer biases associatedThis publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Failure of random zero sphygmomanometer in general practice.BMJ, 1985
- Sources of error in recording the blood pressure of patients with hypertension in general practice.BMJ, 1984
- Perspectives on systolic hypertension. The Framingham study.Circulation, 1980
- Comparison of performance of various sphygmomanometers with intra-arterial blood-pressure readings.BMJ, 1978
- Evaluation of performance of selected devices for measuring blood pressureThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1973
- A RANDOM-ZERO SPHYGMOMANOMETERThe Lancet, 1970