Relative Risks of Anticoagulant Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Based on an Angiographic Diagnosis vs a Ventilation/Perfusion Scan Diagnosis
- 1 September 1994
- Vol. 106 (3) , 727-730
- https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.106.3.727
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Subcutaneous Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Compared with Continuous Intravenous Heparin in the Treatment of Proximal-Vein ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Complications and validity of pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolism.Circulation, 1992
- Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in the elderlyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991
- Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). The PIOPED InvestigatorsJAMA, 1990
- Heparin for 5 Days as Compared with 10 Days in the Initial Treatment of Proximal Venous ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Continuous Intravenous Heparin Compared with Intermittent Subcutaneous Heparin in the Initial Treatment of Proximal-Vein ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Serial Impedance Plethysmography for Suspected Deep Venous Thrombosis in OutpatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Different Intensities of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in the Treatment of Proximal-Vein ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Adjusted Subcutaneous Heparin versus Warfarin Sodium in the Long-Term Treatment of Venous ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Warfarin Sodium versus Low-Dose Heparin in the Long-Term Treatment of Venous ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979