Advance directives and cancer decision making near the end of life.
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Health Psychology
- Vol. 24 (4, Suppl) , S63-S70
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.s63
Abstract
Seriously ill individuals, including those seriously ill with cancer, are frequently encouraged to complete instructional advance directives (i.e., living wills) to ensure that their wishes about the use of life-sustaining treatment are honored if they should lose the ability to make decisions for themselves. The authors present a social psychological analysis making explicit a series of steps that must necessarily take place if living wills are to honor the wishes of incapacitated patients. They then focus on 3 key steps in the analysis and review relevant research from the medical and psychological literatures. In each case, this research raises serious questions about the psychological assumptions underlying the effective use of living wills in end-of-life decision making. Discussion focuses on the need for policy and law guiding the use of advance directives to be informed by both basic and applied research on judgment and decision making.Keywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Morbidität einzeitiger Abortausräumungen im 2. Trimenon: Eine StandortbestimmungGynäkologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau, 2005
- Social Projection of Transient Drive StatesPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2003
- Stability of Older Adults' Preferences for Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment.Health Psychology, 2003
- Discussion of the do-not-resuscitate order: a pilot study of perceptions of patients with refractory cancerSupportive Care in Cancer, 2002
- It Isn't Just the Sex...American Journal of Bioethics, 2001
- The construction of preference.American Psychologist, 1995
- Disease-specific advance directivesThe Lancet, 1994
- Limitations of listing specific medical interventions in advance directivesPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1991
- Expectancy Processes in the Health Care Interaction SequenceJournal of Social Issues, 1990
- On the Elicitation of Preferences for Alternative TherapiesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982