Nuclear characteristics as indicators of prognosis in node negative breast cancer patients
- 1 November 1989
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
- Vol. 14 (2) , 207-216
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01810737
Abstract
Nine clinical, biologic and histologic variables were evaluated for their significance in predicting the metastasis free survival (MFS) and the overall survival (OS) of 650 histologic node negative breast cancer patients. The variables studied were: menopausal status, UICC clinical stage of disease, Scarff-Bloom and Richardson (SBR) grade and its 3 components, estrogen and progesterone receptors, and anatomic tumor size. Multivariate Cox analyses revealed that histologic grade and clinical stage were the only significant prognostic factors for both MFS and OS. In the SBR grading system, grades I and III clearly have defined those patients with low and high risk for relapse, respectively. However, it is well known that more than 50% of the patients fall into the intermediate risk category, grade II, which provides essentially no useful prognostic information for those patients. To improve the assignment of patients to specific risk groups, a modified grade (MSBR), with five categories ordered according to the degree of malignancy, has been built from the nuclear pleomorphism and the mitotic index of the SBR grade. In combination with clinical stage, MSBR was found to be a prognostic indicator with high discriminatory power and caused the SBR grade to lose its significance. The first three categories of this MSBR may be gathered to designate low risk patients, whereas the last two categories, once combined, contain all the SBR grade III plus 57% of the SBR grade II tumors, and reliably identify high risk node negative patients. We suggest that a systemic adjuvant therapy should be discussed in this high risk group.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Proliferative index in breast carcinoma determined in situ by Ki67 immunostaining and its relationship to clinical and pathological variablesThe Journal of Pathology, 1987
- Nuclear DNA content and prognosis in human breast cancer: A static cytophotometric studyBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1987
- Prognostic implication of labeling index versus estrogen receptors and tumor size in node-negative breast cancerBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1986
- Tumor nuclear grade, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor: Their value alone or in combination as indicators of outcome following adjuvant therapy for breast cancerBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1986
- Prognosis in node-negative breast cancerBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1986
- Ten-Year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Radical Mastectomy and Total Mastectomy with or without RadiationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Histopathological systems of breast cancer classification: reproducibility and clinical significance.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1983
- Revision of the standards for the assessment of hormone receptors in human breast cancer; report of the second E.O.R.T.C. workshop, held on 16–17 March, 1979, in the Netherlands Cancer InstitutePublished by Elsevier ,1980
- Pathologic Identification of Poor Prognosis Stage I (T1N0M0) Cancer of the BreastAnnals of Surgery, 1979
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958